...Adding a Basement...
... ...30 Days in the Hole...
... ... ...Power CONditioning...
Music has always been a very important element in my life. Mom played the piano, Dad always sang fortissimo in church and we had Benny Goodman, Harry James, Al Hirt and a host of others to entertain us. For as long as I can remember, I enjoyed the HiFi aspect of music reproduction. In the early 50's, my dad had a Bogen 30w mono tube amp driving a 12" University co-ax in a box he built that seemed to weigh a ton. It took two grown men to move it. I'm a little vague on the turntable, possibly a Lenco, but I clearly do remember a flip over 'needle' for 78s OR 45s and LPs aka MicroGroove... all mounted in custom built handfinished mahogany cabinetry... in those days HiFi was furniture!
My earliest tweaking recollection is changing the Phono EQ curve knob to obtain the best sound from Harry James, Benny Goodman, Glenn Miller... For nostalgia buffs, here's an interesting site on HiFi Hardware
>| 10 years
We replaced the old Bogen with a Sansui 35w amp, a Dual 1019 and an additional 12" University. Excited as we were to have Stereo, ...
>| 10 years
...Oracle, db, Ampzilla, Dahlquists. A slow learner, it began to penetrate my cranium that printed specs are essentially worthless and the paper better employed elsewhere. [Like counterfeiting, to support an audio habit!] Watts RMS, 0.000% distortion, .1Hz to 1MHz bandwidth, ±.01db ruler flat frequency response, massive damping factor specs are all so much twaddle.
There is next to zero correlation between the musicality of a device and how it measures.
>| 10 years
...Biamped Tympani IIIs, Goldmund TT, Syrinx tonearm, Conrad-Johnson HA, Michael Fisher customized Audio Research SP-6a and his custom 70w quad KT-88 1KW PS power amp w Marantz 9 output transformers, Nikko 350W/Ch woofer amp, Monster Cables and Cartridge[s], VPI Bricks, LAST, Nitty Gritty Record Cleaning Machine... you get idea. The turntable and pre-amp electronics are in a separate room. The Goldmund has its own support anchored to the concrete and the Tympanis are supported on spikes to ensure rigid coupling to the floor. The stack of power amps is placed between the speakers for minimal cable length. OTT? Not a chance!
On well recorded material, this system could raise the hair on the back of your neck. One felt as though one could walk up and join the band playing in the room, be it a Ben Webster trio, Queen or the London Phil... ...some said it sounded too good...
>| 18 years...
Contemporary Travels
Sadly the Nikko started to lose FM signals. We tried a Technics receiver of about the same vin/wat/tage. A few weeks later we decided it had to go. No amount of burn-in was going to tame this beast. Abrasive highs, honky mids, anemic bass, one dimensional. Amusical? In Spades!
One sunny Saturday I pluck up my courage and decide to beard the 'HiFi' salesman in his den. As I approach BOF [Balding Old Fart] status in the eyes of your typical audio emporia purveyor, I did not relish the prospect of the puerile prattle emanating therefrom. Gimme the freakin' remote and piss off!
A sextet of shops later and I'm beginning to think I'll stick with the Nikko, flaky FM and all. Onkyo, Denon, Sony, Yamaha, Marantz receivers auditioned in the 50 to 100w class are not made for the serious reproduction of music. Regardless of loudspeaker, each frequency band appears cut from diverse and threadbare cloth. All exhibit a multiplicity of grating flaws and sonic character defects disqualifying them from any consideration. SLS! *
On a nostalgic whim or in sheer desperation delerium, I decided to enter Shelley's Stereo, our local High End outlet. Known for megabuck systems, I had no hope of finding anything for the pittance I planned to expend. I thought perhaps just a tiny fix of auditory titillation would settle the jitters. After all, I've been clean on the AA [Audiophiles Anonymous] wagon for over 15 years and should be able to handle just one listen.
Zach Zoschke, now at Ambrosia Bel Air, Audio Consultant [really!], approached and asked if he could help. "A musical 2 channel receiver of 50 watts, if you please." He turned on the Rotel RX-1050, handed me the remote and stepped aside. [You could have knocked me over with a feather.] I listened a while, changed loudspeakers a couple of times. I then requested he play some of the aforementioned. A few bars later, all I said was "How much?" While close to treble the cost of the others auditioned, the RX-1050 is worth every sou and an unqualified bargain to boot! Excellent sound stage, cohesive sonic fabric. In one word, Musical! I could wax enthusiastic for kilobytes but fear not, dear reader, for I shall come to the point of this missive lest I render you sonambulant.
After a judicious week long burn in period, we began to seriously audition our new reciever and Rotel RCD-02 Player. Both devices require a warm-up before listening. Impatience will reward the listener with an overall diminshed stage and an especially congested nasality on dense orchestral material. Some claim cables also exhibit similar perturbations...
I connected the components with mid 80s vintage Monster Interlink Reference. While generally pleased, the bass was a trifle artificially detailed and lacking authority, the upper mids a tad forward and strident and the sound stage narrowed and foreshortened. One of the advantages of a prior career in the audio industry is a trove of audio accessory antiquities. [Marylou refers to this collection as 'garbage in the garage.' ] It was most instructive to re-audition cables consigned to the aural dustbin one, two or three decades past. Sadly none of them attained the sonic nirvana we were seeking. Unlike fine wine, and great women, cables do not improve with age.
One discontinued relic that stands the test of time is the Monster Cable DISCUS+. This 'donut' rests atop the CD in the transport and damps oscillation caused by cogging of the drive motor and / or vibration induced by environmental conditions. Images are more detailed and less prone to wander, depth is improved and the background blacker. Jitter, albeit in the low pico second range, is much more audible than most realize. A modern replacement is the De Mat Disc Stablizer. There are many other CD Mat devices currently available. We liked this one. A nice feature is the lip that centers the De Mat on the CD. Sadly, not all CD players accept a stablization mat. We've not heard all CD players, but all that we have are improved with a stablizer.
Another, now resurrected, relic is the VPI Brick. These heavy, iron cored bricks damp chassis vibration and are claimed to soak up stray EMI. Hyberbole aside, system performance is improved. Just like the New and Improved Tide, Blacker Blacks, Whiter Whites...
Fearing not, as interconnect technology must also march inexorably forward, I induced Zach to a weekend loan of interconnects in the 'reasonable' range. 20 years ago, similar pricing would have qualified as 'exhorbitant!' As our speaker cable... ...we replaced it with Tributaries SP2. Solid, detailed, musical. YMMV
We tried Kimber Heroes, StraightWire Rhapsody and Transparent Audio MusicLink.
Why the differences? Beginning in the 70s, a few, and somewhere in the early 80s, the industry as whole, began to realize time coherence, all else equal, more significantly contributes to satisfying aural reproduction. If harmonics arrive anachronistically of their fundamental, your cerebellum has to work overtime to reassemble the music. Initially, the music may appear more detailed - warmer - exciting... but eventually becomes extremely fatiguing. It's not the frequency, it's the time!!
One must never forget euphony. All too many whiz bang systems are simply offal. All colorations add up negatively creating the sonic equivalent of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Our system of the past 15 years, while not particularly accurate, was euphonious. Ditto this.
CDography
Can you spare a quarter for a cup of coffee?
The above are long since gone and we enjoyed our 1985 vintage Nikko NR-850 65w/ch receiver. Generally euphonious with Spica TC-50 MkIIs and Monster interconnects. Warm, cohesive sound with a decent stage.
[ A friend in search of a musicality recently auditioned my system with some of his CDs. Upon listening, I thought the disc, one I'd never heard, a trifle splatty. Opening the CD tray at the end of the track, I realized I'd not used the De Mat. Unbeknownst to my guest, I inserted the De Mat and replayed the track. Immediately, and taken aback, he demanded "What did you do?!?". Pourquoi, mon ami? "I hate to say it but now it's even smoother, more defined and displays a more focused sound stage." I informed him of my error on the first listen. Skeptical that a rubber mat could improve a digital source, I removed the mat and played the track a third time. His response? If I hadn't heard it for myself, I never would have believed it! ]**
- The Kimbers have very nice connectors, perhaps the nicest RCA connectors extant. Enough said. YMMV
- The Rhapsody are the most seductive cables I've auditioned. Ever! I mentioned to Marylou after a couple of hours that it felt like we had a whole new CD collection. Not very long after that idiotic remark, we pulled them out. Artificially detailed in the extreme. Music does not have pin point focus. Skeletal best describes the sound. With each CD I played, I felt like I was being pushed farther and farther into the divan. YMMV
- Next we tried the MusicLinks. Marylou's remark, "Those are the only wires where the clarinet sounds like a clarinet." sums it succinctly. No hyper extended extremes. No artificial detail. Just musicality, plain and simple. Midrange, glorious midrange coherence extending seamlessly. We can listen for hours, a feat in itself with CD program material. YMMV
Please remember : YMMV - [Your Mileage May Vary]
Frank Sinatra - songs for swingin' lovers! - Capitol
Sumi Jo - Virtuoso Arias - Erato
London Festival Orchestra - 1812 Overture - Chesky CD65
[No other 1812 comes close to expressing the anguish of Napoleon's ill fated foray!]
Wynton Marsalis - the midnight BLUES - COLUMBIA
Don Juan DeMarco - Soundtrack - A&M
Slovak Philharmonic - Mendelssohn Symphony No 3 'Scottish' - NAXOS
Karita Mattila - Wonderful - Ondine
- Plus assorted pop CDs, some recorded by YHC.
Recent listening left us a little tantalized. Perhaps the initial patina of the upgrade was beginning to tarnish. While listening to Supertramp's Bloody Well Right, I remarked to Marylou "Listening to this CD makes me want to buy a turntable." She commented, "It doesn't sound very good." In the 70's Crime of the Century was one of our most revealing vinyl records*, especially a UK or European import.
The next day while Marylou was out of the house, I removed and cleaned all the connectors in the audio chain. When Marylou returned, I asked her to listen. She had no idea whatsoever that I had done anything. She immediately said, "It sounds warm. Last night it sounded like it was echoing off a tin plate." An apt metaphor, I agreed. My impression was more like twice reflected in mirror. All the detail was a little blurred. There was a glassy hardness about the stage and the image was two dimensional.
Refreshing the contacts rejuvenated the sonic character.
To paraphrase Will Rogers, 'Every connector I used, I didn't like'. There's more than one studio in LA with the entire I/O chain hardwired. Regretably, I could never convince anyone to solder the electronic interface cards directly. Who knows what extra levels of transparency may have been achieved.
The moral : Never audition anything new without first cleaning all contacts and establishing a baseline for your existing system!
* A note for vinylphiles: Try to obtain original pressings from the country of origin. Foreign pressings are made from EQ copies. The destination playback device will have an unequal response, both in the frequency and time domains, and generally muck up the sound. The mastering electronics, cutting lathe and master lacquer type all introduce other colorations. Over the years I've won many a wager against punters who claimed there could be no difference. After one such wager, the newly educated victim promptly ordered dozens of replacement LPs. He later claimed the improved 'software' made a greater contribution to his listening enjoyment than all his hardware replacements combined!
Over the years we've owned several loudspeakers capable of reproducing all 10 octaves, Celestion Ditton 66s, KEF 105s, Tympani IIIs. While the Spicas excel in many areas, the first two octaves are not their strongest suit. Anechoically, the corner frequency is ~70Hz. In our room, this equates to about -10db in the mid 40s and -20 at 30Hz. Needless to say, the thwack of tympani do not have the same visceral impacts as in Carnegie Hall.
The addition of a Home Theater system last year got the grey matter cogitating that perhaps a sub woofer just might be the ticket to add missing heft. In the last century, sub woofer manufacturers were as scarce as hen's teeth. Today, every TD&H makes one. Just type 'powered subwoofer' in Google and you'll get the idea.
Unprepared for the plethora of choices, yhc spent untold hours perusing websites and audio forums to rectify a distinct lack of erudition in the field. Much of what is posted, especially on AudioReview.com, is from boom box blasters. Quality, not quantity, our quest. Several vials of Visine later, one name consistently received high marks for musicality: REL. Subsequent auditions confirmed it.
With a baseline established, a cruise along the audio waterfront was in order to find the high water mark. We needn't have bothered. Almost universally, audio purveyors are incapable of demonstrating a standard HiFi system satifactorily. Adding a subwoofer ensures it. Chuff and Puff, Thud and Rumble, Boom, Bloat and Blur!! Have these people ever heard unamplified live music? One thinks not, given their enthused comments!
We did hear some homogenous systems with subwoofers where all components are from the same manufacturer and the subwoofer is designed to compliment the primaries. Unfortunately, using subwoofer B with speaker A or vice versa immediately brought the sonic characters in to sharp contrast. As we have no intention of replacing the Spicas, another option was required.
A REL Strata III in Light Oak is only available as an $1800 non refundable Special Order... an alternative had to be found. Frequent searches on eBay, Audiogon and AudioAsylum turned up many possibilities. Just as I was about commit to a purchase of a used REL, I came across interesting references to Audio Concepts Titan LE and Force subwoofers and their musicality vis a vis the REL. More Visine, s'il vous plait...
We decided to give the Force an audition. Audio Concepts sells direct to the consumer with a 30 day 100% No Questions guarantee. We give our unqualified recommendation to the company for service and support. Should you need more than 30 days, they'll extend your evaluation period. 16 digits and four days later, the Force, in Light Oak, arrived, very well packed.
Now the fun begins...
We used the Zone 2 output of our Rotel RX-1050 to drive the Force at line level.
My first thoughts were to ease the load on the Spicas, inserting a HiPass filter in the amplifier line. We tried 72Hz, both First and Second Order. While the transient response on the bottom of the Spicas improved, there is just too much tonal diversity relative to the Force for this to be an acceptable solution.
No manner of adjustment of crossover frequency or slope or phase resulted in any improvement. Soundstage diminished, the bass became wooly and ill defined, focus non existent. As these sonic deficiencies are difficult to ascribe to an increase in low frequency level, I began thinking that perhaps the Zone 2 output was the contributing factor...
How bad can 4 inches of wire sound?
We purchased a pair of Radio Shack Gold Series 42-2536 Y Adapters, 1M-2F. In previous lifetimes, we often were astounded at the improvements made in recording kit by replacing the volume pot wiring with something better than the OEM twist tie. In this instance, I was utterly DUMBFOUNDED at the DEGRADATION caused by these adapters. Grey, gritty grunge on a cardboard panel half the size of our listening space! Back to Zone 2...
Several unsatisfactory hours later, it dawned on me that perhaps the Rotel was indeed the culprit due to inadequate buffering. I turned off the Force and compared the sound with Zone 2 enabled and disabled. Surprisingly, enabling Zone 2 caused the very effects I was ascribing to the Force: Diminished soundstage, wooly bass, non existent focus. Removing the cables from the Zone 2 outputs reduced, but did not remove, the differences. Turning Zone 2 OFF removed the defects entireley. Additional investigation showed that further very subtle improvements are available by selecting a backshorted input for the REC path. And, the B Speaker terminals are less grating in the upper mids.
Most subwoofers today are capable of accepting Speaker or Line Level inputs as a signal source. The REL uses separate connectors, the Force via a -17.7db speaker terminal to RCA line level adapter. [Both methods have their merits and limitations. The Force adapters better isolate a long run of cable from the amp to the subwoofer at the expense of presenting a slightly higher impedance to the subwoofer input.] No discernable degradation could be ascertained from the paralleling of Spicas and adapters.
As I was essentially starting over, I chose to ignore the setup instructions and use the same methodology used in the past to set up recording studio loudspeakers, a combination of tools and listening.
Listen! Tweak!
Listen! Tweak! ...
...and the tympani are visceral!
From cellar to ceiling, we're awash in the ambience of Joni Mitchell's exquisite Travelogue!
Frank Sinatra's back in the old Studio A at Capitol Records, not some rootless replica.
The Force is with us!
Now that we were acclimated to the return of substantial subterranean energy to our listening environment, a 'tune-up' was in order. The Force had been rendered adequately compliant after 30 days in the Hole.
Recalling the experience auditioning subwoofers along the audio litoral, is it possible to take a genuinely excellent product and create a satisfyingly atrocious replica of the subwoofer auditions endured?
Using test equipment only : Real Time Analyser, Sound Pressure Level Meter, Pink Noise, Swept Frequency and Warble Tone generators, it was possible to achieve the Flattest response at the listening position, ±3dB from 20-50Hz. Technically excellent, sonically BLOODY AWFUL! Thuddy, inarticulate and bloated. Just like the demos.
Aurally adjusting the controls for maximum coherence results in the Best graph response, ±5dB from 20-50Hz.
Room Response 15-200Hz. Spica TC-50 MkII with ACI Force SubWoofer
Life is good!
No, there's a Force subwoofer at the end of the sofa.
Every other subwoofer I've ever heard just boomed! ]**
While paddling the audio littoral, we encountered several chassis labelled "Monster Power" and "Panamax".
Inquiry as to the import of said boxes revealed they were "power CONditioners." Old enough to recall the argument between Tesla and Edison whether A/C or D.C. was the preferred method of power transmission, "Uh, huh" and "Yeah, right" summed the level of interest.
A chronic thirst for knowledge, and armed with first hand knowledge that Monster Cable is first and foremost a marketing organization, I trundled over to monstercable.com to learn what the buzz, or perhaps reduction thereof, was about. From Monster's website, an extra terrestial could be forgiven for thinking Monster invented HiFi. That the plethora of price point products are patentable is risible. [All too often, all a patent proves is the examiner is baffled! Michael Jackson patented the shoes he used for those 'moonwalk' dance steps. But I digress...]
One can find $2500 power cords, $80 wall recepticles and apparently the sky is the limit for power CONditioners. The astute may have noticed the UpperCase CON! If P.T. Barnum were alive today, he'd be in the power CONditioner business. Never one to leave a stone unturned, I decided to see how old P.T. would peg me...
I'll preface here that the Rotel RX-1050 incorporates its own internal LC network to accomplish the job of an external power CONditioner, namely remove noise from the A/C [Tesla was correct!] before it contaminates the audio signal in the electronic circuitry. What enhancement / detriment the built in LC network contributes to our results is unknown. Regardless, we're fortunate to have a new power transformer at the end of our end of cul-de-sac driveway providing us with very clean and stable 117VAC. Expecting the additional CONtribution of an external device to fall on the low side of slim and non existant, we opted to critically listen for subtle system changes rather than engage in a comparison of competing units. As you read, please remember YMMV...
Sans datum and compass, I induced several loans of sundry mid price devices : Models 5300 and 5100 from Panamax, HTS-3600 and HTS-3500 MkII from Monster Cable, and at the upper end of the mid price spectrum, a Furman RI-1220. Over the next several weekends, each device was individually evaluated to determine its merits.
The first device evaluated was the Panamax 5300. Quite simply, we were utterly unprepared prepared for the improvement! Dyamics are expanded and more defined. The blackness between instruments is darker. Mumbly vocalists retroactively receive diction lessons. One could be forgiven for thinking some subtle midrange EQ effect is induced, were it not for the increased clarity extending from tympani thwacks through trumpet trills to tiny triangles.
Serendiptiy be damned, this is one of the most significant improvements in 40 years of the quest!! YMMV!!
[ Very Musical! ]**
From a quick reading of the Panamax literature on-line, the primary difference between the 5300 and 5100 appears to be the meter and the front panel convenience outlet. Never one to squander a farthing, a $150 lower cost induced me to try the 5100. Nice. No cigar. YMMV. [A bottle of TwoBuckChuck for the first reader to tell me the circuit difference between the 5100 and 5300.]
The Monster products are a different kettle of fish. Unpepared as we were for the Panamax improvements, flabbergasted was the response to the Monsters. Pages of notes about disembodied sopranos, woodless acoustic guitars, splatty cymbals, wiry celli, ad nauseum... I needn't have bothered! On first listen Marylou declared "It's COLD!" As in "AMUSICAL!" As in "Turn the bloody thing off and send it back! NOW!" So much for my finely nuanced descriptive excreta...
The Furman RI-1220 is smooth as silk and four times as expensive. One needs better ear$ and much better equipment to appreciate it fully.
I opined earlier that Monster is primarily a marketing company. The images below, copied from monstercable.com on May 23, 2004, clearly claim that the products use v2.0 of the Clean Power CONditioning circuitry.
 |
 |
 |
 |
A pre audition email exhange with Monster's technical service also claims the filtration circuity is identical.
From the photos below one can see that the circuitry is NOT the same. The 3600 has a ferrite, some MOVs and snubbers on the downstream side of the filters. The original 3500 and the 3500 MkII do have essentially the same circuitry. V1.2 at the lower right of the 3500 MkII PCB could be a typo. The Mk II does have a different faceplate.
| Monster HTS-3500 MkII | Monster HTS-3600 |
 |
 |
It's academic, as there is sonically very little difference between the Monter products. Perhaps it is because they are made in China and use Rong Feng receptacles? Sounds too much like 'wrong thing'. And that is exactlty what they impress upon the music!! YMMV. [The Rong Feng receptacles are specified solid copper wire only. The 3500 uses aluminium and the 3600 uses stranded copper with brass terminals. What sonic effect results is unknown, but how did the units pass UL or CSA certification?]
Many years ago when auditioning a 'new' line of Monser Cables, we could not detect any sonic or physical difference vis a vis the 'old'. The color... 'nuff said...
The Panamax 5300 is the last [first?] link in our HiFi chain. We began with loudspeakers, added electronics, cables next, a subwoofer and finally a power conditioner. It revised our biases on what contributes significantly to realistic reproduction. I wonder if DWP has any edge wound silver power transformers that require evaluation...
Should you opt to try similar devices, take great care in connecting devices. We configured ours as two separate systems. The primary is HiFi Audio. The secondary, Home Theater. The Panamax 5300 is the single common point. One could negate any improvement by cross connecting between HiFi and HT [aka Radio with Pictures]. Take Monster's taradiddle about what to plug where with a grain of salt. Filters with identical component values behave identically. Noise is noise, regardless of what generates it! Listen!